Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
TEXASRANGERS
| Reward Points: | 5 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 5 |
| Debates: | 0 |
It could be more affordable to benefit all but not completely FREE
If it is free Hospitals and employees would not care possibly then less hospitals will be owned and the government would own hospitals
I kinda agree with this statement as we could lower healthcare costs so alot more could receive it and less debt but not free as it may mess the system up.
I kinda agree but disagree a little on this.The amoung in debt should be lower although I think free healthcare will make hospitals not care anymore and not have any ethics,safety measures or proffessinallity
Even though I believe free healthcare would be beneficial, I believe that if we do change are system in today's world it would either collapse or be a really bad system and cause lots of drama as all the drug companies and insurance companies will sue the government.
I think it would really benefit everyone if the healthcare system stayed the same,although we could lower costs if needed insurances for poor.
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
