Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 3 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
Okay but what if a doctor that’s about to find the cure for cancer gets sick and doesn’t have health care. He would be denied help and his research would be left unfinished. No health care could be the things that could also help us improve.
I agree people without health care shouldn’t be denied help just because they don’t have it. And yes people can’t control their sickness and if they need help they should be able to get it without worries
I think that health care for all has more positive outcomes than no health care for all. With health care supporting everybody we can help more people and keep their wellbeing up. Not having health care for all will deny people help and if you can save someone,no health care shouldn’t be why you don’t help them. Health care should be given to everyone.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |